So how many times have you said, at a dinner party or during a political discussion, how stupid Republicans and racists are ? Well now you have scientific proof.
Researchers from Ontario, Canada’s Brock University have come to the same conclusion that most liberals have asserted for years — both right-wing thinkers and racists alike are stupid.
The conclusion comes after spotting a correlation between children with low IQs and their ideologies later in life. It turns out that those with limited intelligence at a younger age are more likely to exhibit racist tendencies and favor more conservative political thinking as adults.
Dr. Gordon Hodson, a professor of psychology and primary author of the findings, explains.
“Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,” explains Dr. Hodson. Structure and order, of course, are much easier to make sense of than, say, disarray and chaos. Given that, the less intelligent will gravitate towards more manageable ideals and, as he says, “Unfortunately, many of these features can also contribute to prejudice.”
The study in its entirely was published this week in the journal Psychological Science, and there Dr. Hodson and Michael A Busseri write that after studying a data set of 15,874 persons from the UK, “we found that lower general intelligence in childhood predicts greater racism in adulthood, and this effect was largely mediated via conservative ideology.”
“A secondary analysis of a US data set confirmed a predictive effect of poor abstract-reasoning skills on antihomosexual prejudice, a relation partially mediated by both authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact,” add the researchers.
They also say, “right-wing ideologies, which are socially conservative and authoritarian, represent a mechanism through which cognitive ability is linked with prejudice.
“For example,” add the doctors, “research has revealed that individuals who more strongly endorse social conservatism have greater cognitive rigidity, less cognitive flexibility and lower integrative complexity. Socially conservative individuals also perform less well than liberals on standardized ability tests.”
In smaller words (for all your racists out there), here’s how Dr. Brian Nosek from the University of Virginia explains it to the Huffington Post:
“Reality is complicated and messy . . . Ideologies get rid of the messiness and impose a simpler solution. So, it may not be surprising that people with less cognitive capacity will be attracted to simplifying ideologies.”
Of course, the study’s authors note that “all socially conservative people are not prejudiced, and all prejudiced persons are not conservative.”
Although I agree, I’d venture to say most prejudiced people are “conservative”, even if all conservatives aren’t prejudiced.
Author
-
As Publisher and Editor of Moot Magazine, Donovan has brought a voice to Texas' Left Wing and progressive citizens.
View all posts
Not necessarily good new for the progressive thinking people. Neither stupidity nor racism can be cured and there are definitely more stupid people.
But then what's the point anyway? Voters, stupid or otherwise, decide which candidate wins. Voters do not decide who the candidate are. Those holding the money bags pick the candidates, from two wings of the same party, with campaign "contributions". If you still call it democracy, I give up.
What bothers me most is the influences of the money bags is global.
John Dillinger and the likes used to be on the wrong side of the law.
That was then.
Not necessarily good new for the progressive thinking people. Neither stupidity nor racism can be cured and there are definitely more stupid people.
But then what's the point anyway? Voters, stupid or otherwise, decide which candidate wins. Voters do not decide who the candidate are. Those holding the money bags pick the candidates, from two wings of the same party, with campaign "contributions". If you still call it democracy, I give up.
What bothers me most is the influences of the money bags is global.
John Dillinger and the likes used to be on the wrong side of the law.
That was then.